by Raymond Daniel Burke | Feb 7, 2014
The Maryland General Assembly is again considering legislation that would prevent residential condominium developers from including certain provisions in the project’s governing documents or sales contracts that limit the developer’s liability for construction defects. Senate Bill 207 and House Bill 258 would prohibit provisions in the declaration, bylaws or rules and regulations that limit the ability of a council of unit owners to file suit on behalf of itself or the unit owners or enforce warranty claims. The proposed new law would also preclude limits on the rights of condominium councils or individual unit owners to bring claims relating to an alleged failure of the developer to comply with building codes, county approved plans and specifications, product manufacturer’s installation instructions, and other construction industry standards. Proposed new Section 11-134.1 of the Maryland Condominium Act would prohibit provisions designed to prevent the filing of a claim within the applicable period of limitations or prevent claims from accruing pursuant to the “discovery rule.” The new law would also preclude provisions requiring a vote of the unit owners approving the initiation of a claim, unless such a requirement is adopted after the unit owners assume control of the community from the developer. (more…)
by Raymond Daniel Burke | Jan 30, 2014
Legislation pending the the Maryland General Assembly would require Homeowners Associations to provide information needed by a lot owner in connection with a pending re-sale of their home. House Bill 412 and Senate Bill 229 would both require Homeowners Associations to make re-sale disclosure information available upon written request of a lot owner. Presently, Section 11B-106 of the Maryland Homeowners Association Act provides that certain information be provided to a prospective purchaser in the community, and that certain information be included in the contract of sale. The proposed legislation provides that, within twenty days of receiving a written request from the selling owner, the Association must provide the information necessary for the owner to comply with the disclosure requirements. It also limits the fee that could be charged to the owner for preparing the information to the actual cost up to a maximum of Fifty Dollars. Both bills also would impose this same Fifty Dollar limit in charges by condominium councils of unit owners for furnishing the re-sale disclosure information they are required to provide under Section 11-135 of the Maryland Condominium Act.
by Raymond Daniel Burke | Jan 23, 2014
Legislation pending in the 2014 session of the Maryland General Assembly to regulate property managers of residential communities includes provisions that would require property managers to file a fidelity bond or proof of insurance with the Secretary of the Department of Licensing and Regulation. House Bill 10, in addition to requiring that property managers be licensed, would require that any property manager entering into a contract to provide management services to a condominium, cooperative or homeowners association file proof of a fidelity bond, theft insurance, or other comparable written insurance as may be required by the proposed State Board of Common Ownership Community Managers. The bond or insurance would be required to provide coverage in the lesser amount of $2 million or the highest aggregate amount of the operating and reserve balances of the community under the contract during the prior three months.
by Raymond Daniel Burke | Jan 22, 2014
Maybe it is the weather, but we have been receiving a number of questions about condominium insurance coverage as between the common elements and units. Here is a summary: A condominium master policy must, at a minimum, cover property damage to all of the condominium structure, including both the common elements and units as originally constructed and finished by the developer, with the unit owners providing individual insurance for their improvements and personal contents. Section 11-114 of the Maryland Condominium Act states that the council of unit owners is required to maintain insurance “[f]or property and casualty losses to the common elements and the units, exclusive of improvements and betterments installed in the units by the unit owners other than the developer.” (more…)
by Raymond Daniel Burke | Jan 21, 2014
As occurred previously in the most recent legislative sessions, a bill has been filled in the 2014 Maryland General Assembly that propose to establish provisions for the licensing and regulation of property managers of residential communities. House Bill 10 would both amend the Business Occupations and Professions Article of the Maryland Annotated Code to create a State Board of Common Ownership Community Managers in the Department of Licensing and Regulation to issue licenses to the managers of “common ownership communities,” which include condominiums, cooperatives and homeowner associations. Such a license would be required before any individual would be permitted to provide property management services to communities in the State. Applicants would be required to complete a training program and pass an examination, along with paying a licensing fee. The licenses would be issued for two years, and would be renewable upon submission of a renewal applciation and fee.
by Raymond Daniel Burke | Dec 13, 2013
I have received some questions regarding the new law, which took effect on October 1, 2013, that limits the basis for foreclosure of a lien on a condominium unit by the council of unit owners and foreclosure of a lien on a property by a homeowners association. The new law modifies Section 14-204 of the Real Property Article of the Maryland Annotated Code to prohibit condominiums and homeowners associations from foreclosing on liens for anything other than delinquent periodic or special assessments; meaning that unpaid fines may not be the basis for a lien foreclosure. Additionally, the new law requires that related costs and fees be limited to “reasonable costs and attorney’s fees directly related to the filing of the lien and not exceeding the amount of the delinquent assessments.”
Unpaid fines and other charges may still form the basis of a lien, but the lien may not be foreclosed on the basis. (more…)
